Discover Our Collections


  • Collection > National Security Files (remove)
  • Subject > Nuclear weapons (remove)

22 results

  • . IC) Cloaed In accordancewith restrictlonscontainedIn the donor'sdeed of gift. 3/20/2009 C1J ~ DEPARTMENT OF STATE DEPUTY UNDERSECRETARY ~ ~JC:';7, 1964 Dear Chuck: I am passing accordance this this on to you in with our telephone
  • TELEPHONES IIIEPU ■ LIC 7-0200 IIIICPU ■ LIC 7-31129 December 17, MEMORANDUM FOR: McGeorge BWldy Special Assistant ,-OLVN COIIICOIIIAN 1964 VOUNOMAN to the President Dear Mac, Control Data Export License - French AEC With further reference
  • for National Security Affairs Rm 368 - EOB Chuck, This is the matter you today. Perhaps 1t: ,,,,,,.,, about which I telephoned we can chat about it upon your return. Howard C. Brown, Executive Assistant to the Chairman Enclosure: Cy of ltr dtd 12/26/62
  • ~ of these conversations which covered a variety of topics. Mr. GorhMl emphasized that Mr. Grey is a very forthright person who speaks bluntly and to the point. 2. Purpose The prima.ry purpose of the visit of Mr. Grey was to allow him to hold discussions with the GOI
  • factors. 3. (U) Player Nominations. Addressees are requested to nominate participants and confirm their TOP SECRET security clearances to the Cold War Division, Joint War Gaines Agency, by telephone prior to 10 April wHh written confirmation to r~ach
  • in conversion of raw materials into end items. In effect, therefore, current stockpile objectives would provide production support for up to a four-year war. 2. Accessibility of foreign sources of supply.--Department of Defense judgment on the accessibility
  • P. oblem. But I cannot emphasize rongly enough that we are exam· not "indications. ' W. W. Rostow Ve MEMORANDUM FOR: Charles Johnson ch,u.d:_In accordance with our telephone conversation, I am attaching as you requested an excerpt of one item
  • . iEOMiil lo Jovemb r 2, 1965 Dear Hae, Control Aa to our telephone temporary proareas report (from tract fora puter thia. Data conversation onlyt yesterday, this i• a so .. how or other our contract.people 1ot inatructiona Co111Mrce?) to make
  • of the game and the critique, par­ ticipants may be reached by telephone at Code 11, Extension 79860 or 57683 (from civilian phones, call OX 7-9860 or ox 5-7683). • . • b. A final report will be prepared interested agencies and gane players. for distribution
  • : F, ~. IOWA IDAHO vr. UTAH T, IIAMICY, IDCSCUTIVI: Dlllm:TOR May 9, 1962 / F / SEEREf Mr. Charles Eo Johnson National Security CounPil 368 Executive Offices Building Washington 25, Do C. Dear Mr. Johnson: In accordance with our conversation
  • ~GltiL·t 2. Tbore ia a aecond, more s:caneral undorat&nclin" with the Briti1h th:.t we will conault with them bf'fo:-e ·usin:; nuclc.ar weapons ~~ywbore, U possible. The b:Laic l:nlcr stanciini on thi• ?()ir.t is contained in a memorandum of conversation
  • ), of countries other considerations Force Nucleaire after, affecting Strategigue de Gaulle - Restricted The points conversations observers with French by General mostly with discussed Weapons Program: reactions a. likely on nuclear himself What
  • arrangements But there of will will also be some deterrent of depend on (a) the credibility to the defense conversely, over-all take, with the US and by Japan of a nuclear specifically (or, will look around for means to counter ..umbrella
  • . In India's case, an additional factor would be India's view that, as a general matter, its own interests are served by any steps which seem to bring the U.S. and Soviet Union closer to­ gether and which, conversely, deepen the Sino-Soviet split. Further arms
  • knows how far the other can go along with it, and where the limit is beyond which it can advance no fur­ ther." All of which seemed to be Nas­ ser's way of saying that, in conversations with visiting Soviet Premier Aleksei Ko­ sygin, he had discovered